Perhaps this was because the ancient Egyptians were notoriously conservative. Moreover, it was fairly easy to attach the handle to the blade by means of a tang or by cords run through holes in the rear of the blade.īut this does not explain why, when the first piercing axe was finally introduced into Egypt in a much later period, it was socket-less. In the third millennium they were using wide-edged cutting weapons, and it was clearly difficult to fit such blades with a long socket. The ancient Egyptians seem to have rejected the socket-type axe. The Sumerians develop the AxeĮgyptian soldiers with axes besieging a walled city and trying to scale the walls. This variety reflects the way armorers tried to adapt to technical and tactical innovations, as they happened. the duck-bill axe, (see right) with the longer blade and two smaller holes.the eye axe, with two large holes in the blade.This projection and bar and the shape of the blade gave it the outline of an anchor. the anchor axe, with a longer central tang projection from its rear fitted with a crossbar, by which it was fitted better to the handle.It has a short blade and wide edge, the rear of the blade having three projections or tangs by which it was fitted to the handle. the epsilon axe, which gets its name because it is shaped like the figure 3, or the Greek letter epsilon.In this type, the join was strengthened by binding or intertwining with cord. the tang type, in which the rear of the blade is fitted into the handle.“And when a man goeth into the wood with his neighbor to hew wood, and his hand fetcheth a stroke with the axe to cut down the tree, and the head slippeth from the helve, and lighteth upon his neighbor, that he die.” The seven different battle axesĪxes are classified according to the way the blade is joined to the handle:ĭuck-billed axe excavated at Ugarit the socket type, in which the handle is fitted into a socket in the blade The Bible draws attention to it in Deuteronomy 19:5: This, of course, is a danger in all such instruments, even the axe used by the laborer. The blade had to be fitted to the handle in a way that it would not fly off in action. It was also necessary to produce an axe that did not separate into two pieces when it was used. the axe with a short blade and a wide edge was for cutting.the axe with a long blade ending in a short sharp edge was for piercing.But if he wore armor, the piercing axe was required, with power of penetration.Īxes could therefore be broadly divided according to shape, which coincides with their function: The cutting axe was effective against an enemy who fought without armor. This, too, influenced the form of the axeblade. The quality of the enemy’s armor at the time dictated which of these was important. Since the axe was designed for hand-to-hand fighting, its development was guided by the need either to pierce or to cut. the handle was widest at the point of grip, tapering toward the head.To prevent the weapon from leaving the soldier’s hand when swung, The key problem was fitting the head to the handle in such a way that it would not fly off when swung, or break off when struck. Ceremonial axe from Obelisks Temple, Byblos.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |